Pour profiter de
tous les avantages
de ces pages, vous
devez accepter
les cookies

des livres, revues, sites, DVD, Cd-rom, ... , sur la 2e Guerre Mondiale, de 1870 à 1970
 Le menu
 Le forum
 Les livres
 Ajouter un livre, ...
 Où trouver les livres ?
 Le Glossaire
 Les points
 Les pages LdG
 Les objectifs
 La charte
 Droit de réponse


SS - Histoire du service secret nazi - André Brissaud
La description du sujet

Remarque :

Pour que le Glossaire trouve un sigle, il doit être écrit en majuscules

Pour qu'il trouve un mot, il doit ètre orthographié et accentué correctement

§:c (


le Glossaire de Francis a trouvé :

Levy (Jean-Pierre) - Résistance (France)

Fondateur et dirigeant du mouvement de résistance FTP (Francs-Tireurs et partisans).


En Europe de l'est,un pogrom est l'ensemble des actes de violence exercés, dans un laps de temps relativement bref, par tout ou partie d'une population à l'encontre de sa composante juive. Il est soit spontané (et dans ce cas les autorités laissent faire), soit provoqué par les dites autorités (avec la participation de la police: manipulation par le biais des Cent Noirs par exemple; voire participation de l'armée:sotnias cosaques en particulier)
Entre 1880 et 1921, on recense environ 1.230 pogroms qui font 60.000 morts.
L'éventail des violences est assez large (et permet même d'établir un classement entre pogrom "majeur" et pogrom "mineur"):extorsion de fonds: pillage des biens meubles; saccage et incendie des échoppes, des magasins, des habitations; saccage et incendie des synagogues; "passages à tabac", actes de cruauté et de barbarie; viols et meurtres...

Voir aussi "Nuit de Cristal".

Weimar (République de) - Allemagne

Nom du régime politique né en Allemagne au lendemain de la Première Guerre. La république proclamée en 1919 dans la ville de Weimar - d'où son nom - se caractérise par sa faiblesse, ses crises successives et son absence de soutien populaire. La république de Weimar disparaît en 1933.

Dans ce texte :

Il semble de fait ... de Etienne Lorenceau le mardi 03 mars 2015 à 12h43

que l'antisémitisme d'hitler ait été, au moins initialement, uniquement "social". Ce n'est que plus tard que ses spadassins, l'étroit himmler en tête appuyé par des daré, rosenberg, eichman et l'Ahnenerbe, vont en faire une lecture purement "raciale" avec une assimilation psychologique -ou non- au communisme (heydrich, schellenberg).

Le texte ci-dessous me semble suffisament important pour requérir une analyse profonde sous un angle historique et "neutre" (même s'il est difficile aux humanistes que sont généralement les historiens de s'abstraire de l'a priori naturellement généré par le frémissement d'horreur que n'a pu manquer de soulever -au moins a posteriori- toute étude historique de l'antisémitisme)

In 1919, a Herr Adolf Gemlich contacted Hitler asking about the importance of the "Jewish question." At the time, Hitler had recently underwent a course of Pan-German nationalism in which he had distinguished himself by the vehemence of his radical nationalist and anti-Semitic views and by his oratorical talents.
In his response letter to Gemlich, Hitler appears anxious to establish his credentials as a knowledgeable anti-Semite though his rhetoric is quite tame, stressing the need for a "rational" and "scientific" antisemitism. Hitler calls for the "irrevocable removal" of Jews from German life, but it is clear from the context that, at this point, Hitler meant only segregation or expulsion rather than systematic liquidation.
The letter impressed Hitler's superiors and he soon gained a reputation as a man who could inoculate the masses against revolution and whose anti-Semitic rhetoric could help discredit the Weimar Republic.
Dear Herr Gemlich,

The danger posed by Jewry for our people today finds expression in the undeniable aversion of wide sections of our people. The cause of this aversion is not to be found in a clear recognition of the consciously or unconsciously systematic and pernicious effect of the Jews as a totality upon our nation. Rather, it arises mostly from personal contact and from the personal impression which the individual Jew leaves­­almost always an unfavorable one. For this reason, antisemitism is too easily characterized as a mere emotional phenomenon. And yet this is incorrect. Antisemitism as a political movement may not and cannot be defined by emotional impulses, but by recognition of the facts. The facts are these: First, Jewry is absolutely a race and not a religious association. Even the Jews never designate themselves as Jewish Germans, Jewish Poles, or Jewish Americans but always as German, Polish, or American Jews. Jews have never yet adopted much more than the language of the foreign nations among whom they live. A German who is forced to make use of the French language in France, Italian in Italy, Chinese in China does not thereby become a Frenchman, Italian, or Chinaman. It's the same with the Jew who lives among us and is forced to make use of the German language. He does not thereby become a German. Neither does the Mosaic faith, so important for the survival of this race, settle the question of whether someone is a Jew or non­Jew. There is scarcely a race whose members belong exclusively to just one definite religion.

Through thousands of years of the closest kind of inbreeding, Jews in general have maintained their race and their peculiarities far more distinctly than many of the peoples among whom they have lived. And thus comes the fact that there lives amongst us a non­ German, alien race which neither wishes nor is able to sacrifice its racial character or to deny its feeling, thinking, and striving. Nevertheless, it possesses all the political rights we do. If the ethos of the Jews is revealed in the purely material realm, it is even clearer in their thinking and striving. Their dance around the golden calf is becoming a merciless struggle for all those possessions we prize most highly on earth.

The value of the individual is no longer decided by his character or by the significance of his achievements for the totality but exclusively by the size of his fortune, by his money.

The loftiness of a nation is no longer to be measured by the sum of its moral and spiritual powers, but rather by the wealth of its material possessions.

This thinking and striving after money and power, and the feelings that go along with it, serve the purposes of the Jew who is unscrupulous in the choice of methods and pitiless in their employment. In autocratically ruled states he whines for the favor of "His Majesty" and misuses it like a leech fastened upon the nations. In democracies he vies for the favor of the masses, cringes before the "majesty of the people," and recognizes only the majesty of money.

He destroys the character of princes with byzantine flattery, national pride (the strength of a people), with ridicule and shameless breeding to depravity. His method of battle is that public opinion which is never expressed in the press but which is nonetheless managed and falsified by it. His power is the power of money, which multiplies in his hands effortlessly and endlessly through interest, and which forces peoples under the most dangerous of yokes. Its golden glitter, so attractive in the beginning, conceals the ultimately tragic consequences. Everything men strive after as a higher goal, be it religion, socialism, democracy, is to the Jew only means to an end, the way to satisfy his lust for gold and domination.

In his effects and consequences he is like a racial tuberculosis of the nations.

The deduction from all this is the following: an antisemitism based on purely emotional grounds will find its ultimate expression in the form of the pogrom.[1] An antisemitism based on reason, however, must lead to systematic legal combating and elimination of the privileges of the Jews, that which distinguishes the Jews from the other aliens who live among us (an Aliens Law). The ultimate objective [of such legislation] must, however, be the irrevocable removal of the Jews in general.

For both these ends a government of national strength, not of national weakness, is necessary.

The Republic in Germany owes its birth not to the uniform national will of our people but the sly exploitation of a series of circumstances which found general expression in a deep, universal dissatisfaction. These circumstances however were independent of the form of the state and are still operative today. Indeed, more so now than before. Thus, a great portion of our people recognizes that a changed state­form cannot in itself change our situation. For that it will take a rebirth of the moral and spiritual powers of the nation.

And this rebirth cannot be initiated by a state leadership of irresponsible majorities, influenced by certain party dogmas, an irresponsible press, or internationalist phrases and slogans. [It requires] instead the ruthless installation of nationally minded leadership personalities with an inner sense of responsibility.

But these facts deny to the Republic the essential inner support of the nation's spiritual forces. And thus today's state leaders are compelled to seek support among those who draw the exclusive benefits of the new formation of German conditions, and who for this reason were the driving force behind the revolution­­the Jews. Even though (as various statements of the leading personalities reveal) today's leaders fully realized the danger of Jewry, they (seeking their own advantage) accepted the readily proffered support of the Jews and also returned the favor. And this pay­off consisted not only in every possible favoring of Jewry, but above all in the hindrance of the struggle of the betrayed people against its defrauders, that is in the repression of the antisemitic movement.


Adolf Hitler

Sources: Eberhard Jäckel (ed.), Hitler. Sämtliche Aufzeichnungen 1905­1924. (Stuttgart, 1980), pp. 88­90. Translated by Richard S. Levy

*** / ***

Consulter ou enrichir le Glossaire de Francis

Pour contacter les modérateurs : cliquez !

textexp.php bidouillé par Jacques Ghémard le 8 9 2010  Hébergé par PHP-Net PHP-Net  Temps entre début et fin du script : 0.17 s  3 requêtes